SCHRUMPFUNGSVERHALTEN VON COMPOSITES

Die Univertsität Erlangen hat 2006 das Schrumpfungsverhalten von Compositen getestet.

(Anmerkung des Autors: Schade eigentlich, dass die deutschen Zahnärzte diese steuerfinanzierte Forschung nur über den Umweg USA lesen können. Kommentare hierzu bitte im Forum)

Quelle:http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2002SanDiego/techprogram/session_846.htm

2464 Volumetric Polymerization Shrinkage Characteristics of Resin Materials for Different Indications
W. DASCH, U. LOHBAUER, and A. PETSCHELT, University of Erlangen, Germany

Objectives: Recently a reliable method for the determination of polymerization shrinkage has been reviewed and proven by round-robin testing. The test method – so called Archimedes method – has been described in detail and published as German Dental Standard DIN 13907:2005. The purpose of this study was to characterize various methacrylate based materials for particular dental indications by their volumetric shrinkage values.

Methods: Ten restorative composites, three provisional resins (p), and three flowable composites (f) were tested according to the Archimedes method (n=6). All data were analyzed by One Way ANOVA/LSD tests (p<0.05), means with the same letters are statistically the same. Results:

Materials

Manufacturer

Shrinkage

Mean(±S.D.) [%]

PCR100-exp

Kuraray Corp.

1,56 (0,07)a

NHR200-exp

Kuraray Corp.

2,12 (0,07)b

InTens

IvoclarVivadent

2,45 (0,14)c

Filtek Z250

3MEspe

2,50 (0,17)c

Clearfil AP-X

Kuraray Corp.

2,55 (0,12)c

Gradia Direct

GC Corp.

2,63 (0,11)cd

Grandio

Voco

2,87 (0,11)de

Tetric Ceram

IvoclarVivadent

3,11 (0,24)e

QuiXfil

Dentsply

3,09 (0,25)e

Ecusit

DMG Corp.

3,09 (0,12)e

Protemp 3 Garant (p)

3MEspe

4,97 (0,35)f

Struktur Premier (p)

Voco

5,52 (0,28)g

Luxatemp Automix Plus (p)

DMG Corp.

5,74 (0,17)g

Grandio Flow (f)

Voco

9,00 (0,29)h

Tetric Flow (f)

IvoclarVivadent

9,02 (0,24)h

X-Flow (f)

Dentsply

10,4 (0,29)i

 

Conclusions: All direct restorative materials revealed smaller volumetric shrinkage values in comparison to flowable composites and provisional resins. PCR100-exp showed significantly the lowest shrinkage value of all composites tested. Each group of materials for a particular indication was significantly different from the other groups, obviously in relation to the amount of inorganic filler. The Archimedes method proved to be a precise and reliable testing method, showing low standard deviation values.

Seq #198 – Dental Materials: VI – Polymer Materials-Mechanical Properties and Degradation
8:00 AM-10:00 AM, Saturday, 1 July 2006 Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre P5

Back to the Dental Materials: VI – Polymer Materials-Mechanical Properties and Degradation Program
Back to the IADR General Session & Exhibition (June 28 – July 1, 2006)